Workflow clarity
Can users see what is missing, what is blocking, and what is only a warning?
Open path →Vendor evaluation scorecard
Score clarity, controls, and operational proof instead of slideware promises.
A balanced evaluation scorecard for comparing public filing correction, queue control, packet readiness, State IT boundary, privacy posture, support readiness, and pilot metrics.
Score areas
7Vendor attacks
AvoidedEvidence basis
RoutesPilot metrics
IncludedOperational control
Can clerks see queue age, deficiency status, scheduling need, and closure code?
Open path →Technical boundary
Are static, runtime, adapter, audit, and no-mutation boundaries visible?
Open path →Support readiness
Are escalation paths, training records, and fallback support routes defined?
Open path →Operational proof
Vendor evaluation scorecard board
The scorecard compares proof and controls. It avoids vendor attacks and keeps selection criteria tied to observable routes.
| Score area | Question | Proof route |
|---|---|---|
| Filing clarity | Does the product prevent mystery rejection loops? | /demo/e-file/preflight/ |
| Court operations | Does the queue show work, risk, and closure? | /demo/judicial/clerk/live-dispatch/ |
| Security posture | Are production dependencies explicit? | /demo/state-it/evaluation-room/ |
| Pilot discipline | Are success and expansion gates measurable? | /demo/pilot-success-contract/ |
Reviewer-visible checks
- vendor evaluation scorecard visible
- vendor attacks avoided
- evidence route basis
- pilot metrics included
- selection criteria observable
What this proves
The public package has a clear next step.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Audience path
Plan selection
- 2Public proof route
Account workspace
- 3Review standard
Settings and connections
- 4Forwardable next step
Review-safe outputs
No private user dataReview-safe public posture
No live court connectionReview-safe public posture
No legal decision by automationReview-safe public posture
Production requires configured adaptersReview-safe public posture
Review standard
Automation assists. Human review controls official records.
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.