Name the person responsible for the next step and the route they should review first.
Open path →Capture the meeting outcome without pretending production is already configured.
A forwardable decision-record page that separates interest, next action, required configuration, pilot scope, and open questions.
Keep pilot scope tied to route families, metrics, limitations, and configuration requirements.
Open path →Separate policy, technical, operational, and commercial questions so each reviewer can answer the right part.
Open path →Record what remains institutional configuration required rather than implying a live filing system.
Open path →Decision record fields
The decision record keeps follow-up disciplined: no vague interest, no hidden production assumptions, no unmanaged open items.
| Field | Required content | Route support |
|---|---|---|
| Interest level | Seat, pilot, or State review path. | /demo/reviewer-next-actions.html |
| Named owner | Person or role responsible for next action. | /demo/stakeholder-follow-up-kit.html |
| Configuration dependency | Auth, adapter, audit, persistence, ingest. | /demo/implementation-readiness-close.html |
| Pilot boundary | Included routes, metrics, and limitations. | /pilot/print.html |
- decision record fields visible
- production claim not implied
- open questions grouped
- decision owner required
- human review required
The public package has a clear next step.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Audience path
Plan selection
- 2Public proof route
Account workspace
- 3Review standard
Settings and connections
- 4Forwardable next step
Review-safe outputs
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.
