Identify whether the reviewer is focused on seats, public filing, court operations, leadership outcomes, or technical review.
Open path →Run a thirty-minute reviewer meeting from a route-backed agenda.
A meeting agenda that moves from reviewer fit to operational proof, risk boundary, pilot scope, and assigned next step without drifting into unstructured product tour language.
Open one complete workflow: Pro Se packet, e-filing repair, clerk dispatch, judge packet, or State IT boundary.
Open path →Name public collateral limits, fictional records, no live court connection, and human review controls.
Open path →End with a seat path, stakeholder review packet, State IT evaluation room, or controlled pilot scope.
Open path →Meeting agenda checklist
The agenda keeps the public walkthrough reviewer-safe while still letting the presenter show deep operational proof.
| Agenda block | Route to open | Exit question |
|---|---|---|
| Fit | /review.html | Which Reviewer path matters most? |
| Proof | /demo/reviewer-proof-board.html | Which workflow should we inspect? |
| Boundary | /demo/static-boundary-proof.html | Which adapters or policies need review? |
| Close | /demo/reviewer-next-actions.html | Who owns the next step? |
- meeting agenda checklist visible
- decision owner required
- workflow proof named
- risk boundary stated
- route-backed follow-up
The public package has a clear next step.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Audience path
Plan selection
- 2Public proof route
Account workspace
- 3Review standard
Settings and connections
- 4Forwardable next step
Review-safe outputs
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.
