Party-by-party status
Each party has a selected, missing, unauthorized, manual-service, or not-applicable service state.
Open path →Service contact board
Make service defects visible before they become rejection loops.
A service-contact board shows every party, available contact, authorization state, selected service method, filing type mismatch, manual-service fallback, and correction action.
Parties checked
AllService states
6Mismatch
VisibleAudit snapshot
SavedFiling type mismatch
eFile Only and eFile and Serve are separated so service defects do not hide behind vague errors.
Open path →Correction options
Select authorized contact, add a permitted contact, switch method, or mark manual service required.
Open path →Audit snapshot
The service state is saved into the filing attempt record before staging.
Open path →Operational proof
Service-contact board fields
The board demonstrates the exact information users need before submitting.
| Field | Example state | Correction path |
|---|---|---|
| Responding party | No selected authorized contact | Select contact or mark manual service. |
| Filing type | eFile and Serve selected | Switch to eFile Only if service is not available. |
| Case service list | Filer not associated | Request association or use manual-service fallback. |
| Audit state | Snapshot pending | Save service snapshot before staging. |
Reviewer-visible checks
- Affected party visible
- Authorization state visible
- Filing type mismatch visible
- Manual service fallback visible
- Audit snapshot visible
What this proves
Filing can be corrected before users get trapped.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Upload-first filing path
Authenticated filer account
- 2Complete preflight checklist
Court-approved filing adapter
- 3Correction and relation-back posture
Persistence and audit adapters
- 4Fallback packet and support route
Human confirmation before staging
Parser output is untrusted until reviewedReview-safe public posture
Submission staging blocked before confirmationReview-safe public posture
Technical defects separated from legal sufficiencyReview-safe public posture
Fallback packet avoids legal conclusionsReview-safe public posture
Review standard
Automation assists. Human review controls official records.
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.