Court and docket review
Capture court, docket, parties, children, orders, issues, safety flags, and missing items without turning extracted values into official case truth before review.
Open path →Pro Se intake
Start a matter with review-first guided intake.
Capture court, docket, parties, children, orders, issues, safety flags, and missing items without turning extracted values into official case truth before review.
Next step
Upload recordsReview gate
RequiredOutput
Matter shellPrivate notes
SeparatePeople and child relationships
Capture court, docket, parties, children, orders, issues, safety flags, and missing items without turning extracted values into official case truth before review.
Missing-item checklist
Capture court, docket, parties, children, orders, issues, safety flags, and missing items without turning extracted values into official case truth before review.
Resume saved intake
Capture court, docket, parties, children, orders, issues, safety flags, and missing items without turning extracted values into official case truth before review.
What this proves
The public package has a clear next step.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Audience path
Plan selection
- 2Public proof route
Account workspace
- 3Review standard
Settings and connections
- 4Forwardable next step
Review-safe outputs
No private user dataReview-safe public posture
No live court connectionReview-safe public posture
No legal decision by automationReview-safe public posture
Production requires configured adaptersReview-safe public posture
Review standard
Automation assists. Human review controls official records.
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.