Service configuration
Affected party, selected contact, service method, and manual-service fallback are named before staging.
Open path →E-filing defect taxonomy
Turn rejection confusion into named correction categories.
The defect taxonomy page explains how the filing walkthrough separates service, caption, attachment, fee, relation-back, support, and legal-sufficiency warnings.
Defect families
7Blocking vs warning
SeparatedAffected item
NamedRepair path
VisibleDocument structure
Missing signature, companion document, proposed order, attachment class, or format issue is separated from legal sufficiency.
Open path →Relation-back posture
Original attempt, rejection notice, first resubmission, and comments-to-court language stay visible.
Open path →Fallback support
If the portal blocks the user, the attempt ledger and fallback packet preserve factual history without legal conclusions.
Open path →Operational proof
Defect taxonomy board
The taxonomy is the reason the filing lane feels different: defects are grouped, named, corrected, and preserved in a reviewable record.
| Category | Named field | Correction path |
|---|---|---|
| Service | Party/contact/service method | Select contact or mark manual service. |
| Caption | Court, docket, party caption | Edit and reconfirm reviewed values. |
| Attachment | Document and companion item | Attach, replace, or classify. |
| Relation-back | Original attempt and rejection date | Generate reviewed resubmission comment. |
Reviewer-visible checks
- defect taxonomy board visible
- affected item named
- blocking and warning separated
- relation-back posture visible
- human review required
What this proves
Filing can be corrected before users get trapped.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Upload-first filing path
Authenticated filer account
- 2Complete preflight checklist
Court-approved filing adapter
- 3Correction and relation-back posture
Persistence and audit adapters
- 4Fallback packet and support route
Human confirmation before staging
Parser output is untrusted until reviewedReview-safe public posture
Submission staging blocked before confirmationReview-safe public posture
Technical defects separated from legal sufficiencyReview-safe public posture
Fallback packet avoids legal conclusionsReview-safe public posture
Review standard
Automation assists. Human review controls official records.
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.