Suggested court, docket, parties, filing type, and attachments remain editable before staging.
Open path →Automation assists; reviewed confirmation controls staging.
A public proof page for the human review rule: extracted filing details can be suggested, but editing a reviewed value resets confirmation before staging.
Changing a reviewed value returns the packet to review required so staging cannot silently continue.
Open path →The screen distinguishes parser suggestion, user-edited value, and reviewed value.
Open path →Reviewed confirmation and reset history flow into the filing attempt ledger.
Open path →Review confirmation state table
This page makes the human-control rule easy to show: no official step moves forward until the reviewed state is present and current.
| State | User sees | Allowed action |
|---|---|---|
| Suggested | Parser value with confidence. | Edit or confirm. |
| Reviewed | User confirmed current value. | Continue to staging. |
| Edited after review | Review required appears again. | Reconfirm before staging. |
| Unreviewed blocker | Disabled submit action. | Resolve missing review first. |
- review confirmation state table visible
- automation assists only
- reviewed confirmation controls staging
- editing resets review
- audit posture visible
Filing can be corrected before users get trapped.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Upload-first filing path
Authenticated filer account
- 2Complete preflight checklist
Court-approved filing adapter
- 3Correction and relation-back posture
Persistence and audit adapters
- 4Fallback packet and support route
Human confirmation before staging
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.
