Decision board
Judges see packet-ready matters, hearing posture, source confidence, and reserved decision aging.
Open path →Judge decision readiness proof
Show chambers decision-ready packets without clerk intake noise.
A chambers-focused proof route: bench packet, source confidence, contradictions, hearing readiness, reserved decisions, and order workbench posture.
Intake noise
RemovedSource confidence
VisibleChambers notes
FencedReserved aging
TrackedBench packet review
Packet facts stay source-backed with weak-proof warnings and contradiction review.
Open path →Order posture
Order drafting stays tied to reviewed facts, chambers notes, protected visibility, and human review.
Open path →Reserved decision aging
Aging bands are visible without exposing case-level details to the wrong audience.
Open path →Operational proof
Decision readiness proof table
This proof route shows how chambers moves from packet review to decision work without leaving context.
| Chambers need | Proof signal | Route |
|---|---|---|
| Know what is ready | Decision board lanes. | /demo/judicial/judge/decision-board.html |
| Trust the packet | Source confidence and warnings. | /demo/judicial/judge/source-confidence-lab.html |
| Handle contradictions | Contradiction review posture. | /demo/judicial/judge/contradictions.html |
| Prepare order work | Order workbench fields. | /demo/judicial/judge/order-workbench.html |
Reviewer-visible checks
- decision readiness proof table visible
- intake noise removed
- source confidence visible
- chambers notes fenced
- reserved aging tracked
What this proves
Court operations can be queue-first and role-safe.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Queue-first operations
Authenticated role claims
- 2Role-safe visibility
Court assignment model
- 3Packet and audit posture
Persistence, audit, storage, and export adapters
- 4State IT configuration boundary
Configured pilot limitations
No private user dataReview-safe public posture
No live court connectionReview-safe public posture
No legal decision by automationReview-safe public posture
Production requires configured adaptersReview-safe public posture
Review standard
Automation assists. Human review controls official records.
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.