No. Automation assists with organization, review prompts, and summaries. Human review controls official actions.
Open path →Answer hard public questions with limits and safeguards visible.
A public FAQ for risks around AI, privacy, legal advice, access inequality, bias, security, court acceptance, support burden, and production configuration requirements.
The public proof site is not connected to a live court system. Production requires configured, court-approved adapters.
Open path →Public routes use fictional records and aggregate proof. Private records require role-safe, configured runtime systems.
Open path →Limitations, adapters, policy variance, training, and support requirements stay visible before expansion.
Open path →Public risk FAQ board
The FAQ keeps trust by answering hard questions directly, naming limits, and routing sensitive topics to the proper owner.
| Risk question | Answer posture | Escalation |
|---|---|---|
| Does automation decide? | Assistive only; human review controls. | Policy and product owner. |
| Is the site live? | Public proof only; no live court connection. | State IT go-live boundary. |
| What about privacy? | Fictional and aggregate public proof. | Privacy/civil-rights owner. |
| What if errors occur? | Support, correction, and governance loops. | Support operating model. |
- public risk faq visible
- ai decisioning no
- court connection no live link
- private records protected
- limitations visible
The public package has a clear next step.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Audience path
Plan selection
- 2Public proof route
Account workspace
- 3Review standard
Settings and connections
- 4Forwardable next step
Review-safe outputs
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.
