Defect category
A rejection notice becomes categorized correction tasks with affected document, party, rule category, relation-back risk, and next action.
Open path →Deficiency repair
Turn a rejection into structured repair tasks.
A rejection notice becomes categorized correction tasks with affected document, party, rule category, relation-back risk, and next action.
Repair queue
StructuredRelation-back risk
ShownRecheck
AvailableHistory
PreservedAffected item
A rejection notice becomes categorized correction tasks with affected document, party, rule category, relation-back risk, and next action.
Correction task
A rejection notice becomes categorized correction tasks with affected document, party, rule category, relation-back risk, and next action.
Recheck after repair
A rejection notice becomes categorized correction tasks with affected document, party, rule category, relation-back risk, and next action.
What this proves
Filing can be corrected before users get trapped.
Human review remains the control point. This route is a public training record with fictional records and is not connected to a live court system.
- 1Upload-first filing path
Authenticated filer account
- 2Complete preflight checklist
Court-approved filing adapter
- 3Correction and relation-back posture
Persistence and audit adapters
- 4Fallback packet and support route
Human confirmation before staging
Parser output is untrusted until reviewedReview-safe public posture
Submission staging blocked before confirmationReview-safe public posture
Technical defects separated from legal sufficiencyReview-safe public posture
Fallback packet avoids legal conclusionsReview-safe public posture
Review standard
Automation assists. Human review controls official records.
This public walkthrough uses fictional training records. It does not submit filings, change court records, provide legal advice, or connect to a live court system. Production use requires authenticated access, configured adapters, audit logging, and court-approved integration boundaries.