One fictional filing moves through upload, editable review, deficiency correction, scheduling, service/proof, and packet-ready status.
Verify the public package before anyone shares the demo.
This board keeps the static judicial demonstration review-safe: fictional records only, no live court-system connection, visible demo notices, working local routes, human review controls, and aggregate public metrics.
Use these gates before publishing or sending the demo link. They focus on the visible user experience, static route health, review-safe wording, and clear boundaries around fictional records.
Autofill and extraction are presented as reviewed information. Staging and packet movement remain human-controlled in the storyline.
Clerk, judge, leadership, and public-proof pages show what is waiting, deficient, unscheduled, missing service/proof, or packet-ready.
Metrics stay at the demonstration and public-performance level, avoiding case-level exposure or protected content.
| Review area | Ready wording | Not allowed |
|---|---|---|
| Demo status | Static judicial demonstration using fictional records. | Any suggestion that the site is connected to a live court system. |
| Operational claim | Shows where work is waiting, blocked, deficient, unscheduled, unserved, or packet-ready. | Claims that the demo alone reduces outcomes, resolves cases, or replaces court judgment. |
| Automation posture | Information can be organized for human review. | Language implying AI decides, submits, or advances filings by itself. |
| Public metrics | Aggregate measures and fictional training data. | Case-level disclosure, sealed details, or real docket-looking examples. |
| Next step | Controlled pilot planning with agreed measures and safeguards. | Immediate production deployment claims without institutional configuration. |