Select one court unit, filing type, user set, record class, reporting boundary, and support owner.
Controlled pilot planning
Evaluate the operations layer before expanding the workflow.
This plan gives reviewers a measured path from public demonstration to limited pilot review. It keeps the scope narrow, the records fictional until approved, the measures aggregate, and the human review safeguards visible.
Pilot posture: measure queue visibility, correction loops, scheduling gaps, service/proof exceptions, and packet readiness. Do not claim legal outcome changes from a demonstration.
Pilot sequence
Four stages, each with a clear control point.
Capture current aggregate counts for first touch, corrections, service/proof gaps, slotting, packet readiness, and age bands.
Move reviewed filings through intake, correction, scheduling, service/proof, packet readiness, and decision-ready handoff.
Decide whether to hold, revise, or expand based on agreed measures, safeguards, support observations, and readiness gates.
Interactive pilot stage
Select a stage to see the control point.
Scope the review lane
Confirm the court unit, filing lane, record classes, user roles, reporting boundary, and support process before measuring anything.
Control point: written scope and public reporting boundary.
Measures
Use aggregate operational measures, not case-level exposure.
| Work area | What the pilot measures | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Intake first touch | Time from received packet to first clerk review | Shows whether new filings are sitting unseen. |
| Deficiency turnaround | Returned items, corrected items, abandoned corrections, duplicate suppression | Shows where rework is accumulating. |
| Scheduling | Items awaiting slotting, collisions, rescheduled matters, at-risk hearings | Shows whether packets are ready when calendar time is available. |
| Service and proof | Scheduled matters missing service status or proof records | Shows what blocks movement after filing review. |
| Packet readiness | Reviewed packets, missing attachments, ready-for-review packets, decision-ready handoff | Shows whether the work is organized before chambers review. |
| Public reporting | Aggregate counts, age bands, trend movement, and readiness gates | Keeps the public view focused on system performance rather than protected case detail. |
Safeguards
Keep the pilot narrow, human-reviewed, and public-safe.
Information can be organized for review, but reviewed status controls whether the packet can move forward.
Public, clerk, judge, prosecutor, defender, leadership, and public-performance views stay separated by purpose.
Public reporting shows system performance, not protected case content.
Deficiencies, corrections, and reviewed status remain visible so rework can be measured honestly.
Configuration, policy, training, support, privacy, and data-handling gates must be cleared before expansion.
The pilot evaluates operational visibility and workflow movement; it does not promise legal outcomes.
Decision gate checklist
Use these gates before moving from demonstration review to pilot planning.
0 of 6 pilot gates checked.
Next step
Move from the plan into readiness review.
After the controlled pilot plan is reviewed, the implementation readiness page turns the plan into concrete scope, role, record, metric, and public-reporting gates.